Winvest Group Ltd. (WNLV) 10‑K Review: A Deep Dive into an Emerging Film Financing Play

Welcome to our in‑depth 10‑K review of Winvest Group Ltd. (OTCQB: WNLV), a small‐cap company seeking to reinvent itself in the film financing and content technology space. This analysis examines the company’s business model, strategy, financial performance, key opportunities and risks, and provides an investment score with a rationale for prospective investors.

Warren.AI 💰 3.0 / 10

---

1. Company Overview and Evolution

Corporate history. Winvest Group Ltd. traces its origins to 2009 as a software and web‐services venture. After various pivots—biodegradable plastics, shell status—2021 marked a turning point. Control shifted to new management (Wan Nyuk Ming, Ng Chian Yin, Jeffrey Wong Kah Mun) via a series of custodian and share exchanges.

Strategic acquisition. In May 2022, WNLV acquired 100% of two operating subsidiaries through a share exchange:

• The Catalyst Group Entertainment (TCG) (Hollywood‐based film finance & production)
• IQI Media, Inc. (IQI) (Pasadena content studio and ad‐tech services)

All previously shell status ended with this recapitalization. WNLV became the public platform for these media operations.

---

2. Business Segments and Model

2.1 The Catalyst Group Entertainment (TCG)

TCG is a niche film financing and production outfit led by industry veterans (finance, legal, distribution). It provides:

• Pre‑sale financing: Using fully packaged film projects, securing minimum guarantees from distributors.
• Tax‐incentive loans: Leveraging state film rebates as collateral at 8–12% interest.
• Mezzanine/gap financing: Lending against unsold territories, often with net‐profit participation.

Strengths:

• First‐priority security interest in IP via UCC‐1 filings
• Principals’ track records and industry contacts
• Lower cost structure (in‐house legal team)

2.2 IQI Media, Inc.

IQI is a full‐service content studio with 20+ years of production experience:

1. MaiContent aggregator platform (B2B) – a soon‐to‐launch content marketplace for filmmakers and OTT partners
2. Original content slate – feature films, limited series, animation (e.g., “Sunday Dinner,” “Christmas Café,” “Cured,” “Winnie‐the‐Pooh Prequel”)
3. Content management & ad services – video production + growth analytics for brand clients

IQI also plans a proprietary distribution platform, Launchrr, targeted to empower indie filmmakers.

---

3. Financial Performance (FY2024 vs. FY2023)

Summary for the year ended 12/31/24:

• Revenue: $77,340 (vs. $339,943 in 2023)
• Net loss: $(1.08M) vs. $(0.88M) in 2023
• Operating expenses: $760K (down from $1.10M) primarily legal, audit, salaries, marketing
• Cash used in operations: $(351K) vs. $(230K)
• Cash: $181,522 at year‑end (vs. $45,070)
• Investments: $14.4M, up from $1.2M (due to share exchanges with Infinity Fund Australia)
• Debt: $676K in interest‐free related‐party loans (management and parent)
• Going concern: Auditor’s report flags substantial doubt; accumulated deficit >$105M

3.1 Revenue Drivers & Cost Structure

• IQI advertising/content services shrank after key contracts ended (Pacific Range Hood, Superco Appliances in 2023)
• TCG has yet to close major film finance deals ($6–24M target projects not yet funded)
• High fixed costs for audit, compliance, platform development despite minimal revenues

3.2 Liquidity & Runway

• Operational burn of $350–450K per year vs. modest existing cash
• Reliance on parent funding and related‐party loans
• Urgent need for capital infusion: equity raises or partnering film co‑financiers

---

4. Key Risks & Challenges

1. Early stage; limited track record. Post‑acquisition operations only ramped in late 2022; no proven profitability.
2. Film financing risk. Success hinges on accurate deal‑sourcing, production oversight, and box‑office/streaming performance.
3. Technology execution. The MaiContent aggregator and Launchrr platform remain unproven prototypes.
4. Going concern. Auditor expresses doubt; cash runway <6 months absent new financing.
5. Stock structure. Preferred votes (50:1 conversion) grant controlling shareholders >90% voting power—a potential takeover defense.
6. Regulatory & IP. Film financing implicates complex securities, intellectual property and distribution agreements.

---

5. Upside Opportunities

• Niche financing gap. Independent producers often seek the kind of flexible pre‑sale and mezzanine support TCG offers.
• Content explosion. Global streaming platforms (Netflix, Amazon, Hulu) need curated content; IQI could ride this tailwind.
• Aggregator platform. If MaiContent gains traction, it could unlock recurring subscription revenues from B2B users.
• IP development. Original titles (e.g., family films, animated series) offer high margin potential upon licensing.

However, execution hurdles remain steep.

---

6. Investment Score

We assign 3.0 / 10 to WNLV based on:

• Limited revenues: <$100K topline in FY2024 against $1M+ burn
• Substantial losses: Loss widening vs. revenue decline
• Going concern: Auditor flags survival risk; dependent on fresh capital
• Speculative model: Film financing and platform tech require execution capital and expertise
• Equity structure: Over 90% voting by preferred insiders leaves public float illiquid

Bottom line: WNLV is a high‐risk, speculative play—potentially appealing to deep‐value contrarians or film industry specialists—but unsuitable for risk‐averse investors.

---

7. Conclusion & Next Steps

Winvest Group Ltd. offers a compelling storyline—transforming a shell into a film finance and tech platform. But story alone cannot sustain a public company. Key catalysts to watch:

1. Fundraising: Ability to close strategic equity or debt financing to extend runway
2. TCG first deals: Signing minimum guarantee or co‑finance agreements of $6M+ film projects
3. MaiContent MVP rollout: Platform go‑live, user acquisition metrics, initial subscription revenues
4. Content licensing: Securing distribution deals for original titles
5. Improved governance: Transparency on use of funds and related‑party transactions

Absent these milestones, WNLV is unlikely to bridge cash deficits. We maintain a conservative view and a low risk‐adjusted score. Investors seeking exposure to entertainment finance may prefer diversified film funds or larger studios with proven track records.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Investors must conduct their own due diligence.

---

Analyst: Tenured Investment Consultant – [Your Name]